This is a repost so all VXO material is in one place to get at.Mon, 02/22/2010 - 09:57 - wb8icn
While cleaning up some old doc's and notes last night, I ran across my copy of the 1999 FDIM Proceedings. George Dobbs3RJV had did a presentation detailing four small QRP projects for an evening or weekend, to include a Universal VXO (page 61 - 64). Reading through that article turned on a huge light bulb for me explaining why (or at least acknowledged that it is a reality and practical possibility to attain large swings) I was seeing a large swing on my 80 meter VXO project.
First of all, I love how George writes and speaks...a Master in His Own Time! Anyway, George commented that DJ1ZB had wrote in one of the G-QRP Sprats that the in-series inductor with the variable cap and xtal in a VXO circuit can be improved by breaking up the inductor into two nearly equal value inductors to be laid side-by-side for interaction. This allows for interaction which in-turn produces freq swings well beyond the normal swing for a VXO. Nothing was said about using two xtals, which I did, so maybe there is a lot of promise in this endevour. I sit here watching yet another 5 to 8 inches of white rain coming down, so great day to snuff some VXO fumes and see how the following might be useful ... or not.
1. Two xtals in parallel and series
2. Using molded inductors (so far that is what I have used), but then try wingding some roids to redo the test using ferrite/iron powder
3. Does the oscillator circuit, the use of a 2N2222A, or 2N4401, etc, makes any difference in the amount of freq swing
4. What is the drift, stability, and noise associated with a Super VXO
OK, enough for now. Time to get a quick letter out to my youngest daughter who is now in Navy Boot Camp and also get my wife's morning cappucino made...I have lived in a house of woman all my life, so knowing the rules allows for lots of shack time!!!!! My hat is off the ladies of my life. All of them have served or are serving in the US Military for all the right reasons...I have tried to talk each of them out of it just to be sure, and I saluate each of them. I suspect I should have enough info to write up a nice article for the MI-QRP Club's quarterly mag called the T5W. Might also send it on to BBQ as well.
72...Mikey, WB8ICN
Comments
Great informative post thanks
Great informative post thanks for sharing..... essay writing | dissertations
mbt shoes|coach bags| juicy
mbt shoes|coach bags| juicy couture very good!
Repost into VXO Book....from
Repost into VXO Book....from http://wb8icn.wordpress.com/
40 Meter VXO Design For VRX-1
February 24, 2010 by wb8icn
Finished initial tests for the 40 meter vxo/osc design this morning. Not done with all tests as I want to look at the circuit that George, G3RJV used for his Universal VXO. What I did complete this morning allows me to swing from just under 7.00 Mhz to 7.037 Mhz in a linear manner and still being able to maintain a stable signal source. I need to put it on a dedicated piece of PCB board and mount it on the VRX-1/NS-40 rig and interface it to each.
Due to interaction of two of the inductors, a bit of playing around with it will be necessary to get it exactly where I want it to be (freq swing range). I used two 7.040Mhz xtals, three molded inductors (2, 18 and 20Uh) and a 260pf poly variable cap. The 2 and 18uh inductors lie side-by-side to allow interaction for a larger and more uniform swing.
I hope to try winding some roids this evening to see if I get the same results. Will post schematic and additional info on my web site later.
72's/73's...Mikey, WB8ICN
www.qsl.net/wb8icn
Final VXO Results for VRX-1
I ended up going with a series circuit just like Jason has in the VRX-1. I exchanged the 10uh roid with two 21uh molded inductors in series and physically laying side-by-side. I switched out the vari-cap with a 260pf vari-cap as this was what I had been testing with. I can tune with no issues from about 7.008 to 7.040 MHz. I haven't started the interfacing to the NS-40 yet and it may end up being a case where a separate circuit is used...just don't know yet.
I have some other ideas I want to try still...but wanted to get to a point where I could use the VRX-1 again and play, so this why I have installed this circuit first. If you were just to use a 40 to 44 uh choke, inductor, coil, etc, you won't get the wide freq swing. It seems that the molded inductors when placed next to each other will interact and provide for some rather interesting results.
Why am I hung up on the use of a VXO instead of Hartly oscillator or DDS circuit? I can get a good freq swing and great stability using these modified VXO oscillators and parts count is only five or six...plus I can build it for less than a buck. Doug DeMaw, W1FB (SK) liked the idea of using a VXO verse other methods and now I see why. QRP is homebrew and simple methods for me. I like to be able build things up in a weekend and then play with it. I wish I had gotten more into the "KISS Homebrew" method sooner!!!
[What is KISS? "Keep It Simple Stupid"]
72's/73's...Mikey, WB8ICN
www.qsl.net/wb8icn
Post Log - Final VXO Results for VRX-1
I have been using the new VXO and it works great with the VRX-1. I want to build one for the NS-40 next and end up with a XMT/RCVR station for 40 meters. I should be able to tune both the transmitter and receiver separately from 7.00 to 7.040 Mhz. I thought about just using one VXO for both...but like the idea of separate freq elements for each. I have one more item to add to this combo but can't talk about it till after the middle of April...but it will be the perfect addition!!!
The only other project idea along the lines of the VXO is to build up one for each band, buy some extra crystals and put each band VXO in a separate Altoids tin.
Will add an update when I do get around to that stuff.
72's/73's...Mikey, WB8ICN
www.qsl.net/wb8icn